At the end of 2010, Paris—famed as the world's fashion capital—became the center of a high-stakes battle in the luxury industry. Two of the most powerful names in the sector, LVMH (Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy) and Hermès, found themselves locked in a tense dispute over acquisition and resistance. The conflict was not just about business; it was a clash of vision, legacy, and control.
In late October, LVMH made a bold move by acquiring 17.1% of Hermès through financial derivatives, valuing the stake at around 1.45 billion euros. This sudden maneuver caught many off guard and sparked immediate backlash from Hermès’ family members, who viewed the move as an aggressive and unwelcome intrusion.
The Hermès family strongly opposed the takeover, insisting that they did not need external support and urging LVMH to withdraw. They also called for the French securities regulator to investigate the legitimacy of LVMH’s actions. This marked a significant escalation in the ongoing war between two titans of the luxury world.
The dispute became more than just a financial battle—it turned into a symbolic fight between modern corporate strategy and traditional craftsmanship. Hermès, known for its iconic Birkin bags that customers often wait years to own, represents a rare blend of artistry and exclusivity. LVMH, on the other hand, is a global powerhouse with a history of aggressive acquisitions.
Since 1987, under the leadership of Bernard Arnault, LVMH has expanded relentlessly. From Dior to Givenchy, Loewe to TAG Heuer, and Fendi to Marc Jacobs, the group has built an empire through strategic takeovers. According to Alacrastore, LVMH has completed over 60 acquisitions since the 1980s, creating a vast portfolio of brands.
Arnault’s interest in Hermès is no coincidence. Despite a sluggish luxury market, Hermès continued to grow, making it an attractive target. LVMH, which relies heavily on Louis Vuitton for 55% of its profits, saw an opportunity to diversify and reduce its dependency.
Although Arnault publicly stated that LVMH would not pursue a hostile takeover or seek board seats, many remain skeptical. History shows that once Arnault sets his sights on a brand, he rarely backs down. His previous moves, such as the gradual accumulation of shares in Gucci, suggest a long-term strategy.
As tensions rose, LVMH remained undeterred. Arnault dismissed criticism from French media and local stakeholders, emphasizing that investors have the right to hold their shares. For LVMH, this was another step in its global expansion, further solidifying its dominance in the luxury sector.
Htls Polyester Yarn,Tents Fabric Material,Polyester Yarn Low Shrinkage,Low Shrinkage Polyester Yarn For Coated Fabric
ZHEJIANG GUXIANDAO POLYESTER DOPE DYED YARN CO., LTD , https://www.htpolyesteryarn.com